Friday, January 30, 2026

Michigan Secretary of State Admits Another Noncitizen Vote — But Stonewalls Accountability Questions

 


LANSING, Mich. — Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson has now acknowledged another confirmed case of noncitizen voting in Michigan — while declining to answer basic questions about how often it has happened, how many illegal ballots were cast, or what concrete steps her office is taking to stop it from happening again.

The admission came Thursday after the Department of State reviewed records flagged by Macomb County Clerk Anthony Forlini, whose office uncovered evidence that noncitizens had appeared in jury pools and, in several cases, were registered to vote and had cast ballots.

Speaking at a livestreamed press conference, Benson confirmed that one of the individuals identified in Forlini’s data review was a noncitizen who voted in a Michigan election. She also acknowledged that her office canceled that individual’s voter registration — but refused to disclose how many times the person voted, whether additional illegal ballots were cast, or whether similar cases were previously missed by state reviews.

That refusal has become a pattern.

A Pattern of Admissions — and Evasions

Forlini’s office reported that between September 2025 and January 2026, 239 individuals selected for jury duty in Macomb County self-identified as noncitizens. Cross-checking those names against voter rolls revealed 14 individuals who had registered to vote at some point, including 10 still listed as qualified voters. At least three showed voting histories, and one had voted multiple times before removal.

Under Michigan law, noncitizens are barred from both jury service and voting.

Yet Michigan’s automatic voter registration system — tied to driver’s license transactions — relies on self-attestation of citizenship, not verification against a federal database. The state does not systematically confirm citizenship status before adding individuals to the voter rolls.

Benson has repeatedly insisted that “only U.S. citizens can register to vote or cast ballots in our elections.” The evidence emerging from Macomb County directly contradicts that claim.

Numbers Don’t Add Up

The scope of the issue becomes more troubling when viewed statewide.

When Benson took office, Michigan had approximately 7.5 million registered voters — about 300,000 fewer than the voting-age population. By 2022, the state reported roughly 8.2 million registered voters for a voting-age population of about 7.9 million, following an expansion of automatic registration programs.

Despite those figures, Benson has refused to provide a clear accounting of how many noncitizens have been identified and removed from the voter rolls during her tenure. When pressed by reporters Thursday, she could not — or would not — answer.

Instead, she alleged without documentation that her office has removed more than 1.1 million “out-of-date” registrations, a figure unrelated to the narrower and more serious question of illegal voting by noncitizens.

Prior Testimony, Now Undercut

This is not the first time Benson’s public statements have been undermined by later disclosures.

In September 2024, Benson testified before Congress that there was “no evidence that noncitizens are voting.” One month later, she acknowledged that a Chinese national — a University of Michigan student — illegally cast a ballot in the 2024 election that could not be retrieved once counted.

By April 2025, Benson admitted at least 15 additional illegal ballots were likely cast in that same election. Republican lawmakers later suggested the true number could be significantly higher.

Now, with another confirmed noncitizen vote emerging from Forlini’s findings, Benson again downplayed the significance — while warning that scrutiny itself could harm “faith in elections.”

Shifting Blame, Avoiding Fixes

Rather than outlining corrective measures, Benson has focused her criticism on those who uncovered the problem.

She accused Forlini and federal investigators of attempting to “intimidate” state officials and suggested that efforts to tighten election safeguards are politically motivated. At the same time, she continues to campaign against proposals requiring proof of citizenship or photo identification to vote — measures supporters argue would directly address the vulnerabilities now on display.

Despite promising in 2025 to work with lawmakers on legislation to prevent illegal voting, no such bill has materialized from her office. Instead, Benson proposed a slate of election rule changes critics say would make challenges to illegal votes more difficult.

She also declined to specify what steps, if any, her office is taking to prevent noncitizen voting going forward.

The Core Question Remains

At issue is not rhetoric, but responsibility.

Michigan law is clear. Voting by noncitizens is illegal. Each confirmed case represents not just a clerical error, but a breakdown in election administration. Yet Benson — now overseeing the state’s election system while campaigning for higher office — has offered assurances instead of answers, narratives instead of numbers.

Forlini’s findings suggest the problem may not be isolated. Benson’s unwillingness to fully account for it has only intensified scrutiny.

As one confirmed noncitizen vote becomes two, then sixteen, then potentially dozens, the question facing Michigan voters is simple: how many more went undetected — and why does the state’s chief election official still refuse to say?

Thursday, January 29, 2026

The British Invasion: How Josh & Jase Turned Michigan Into a Viral Winter Playground

 

Michigan didn’t just get visitors this winter — it got headliners.

British creators Josh Cauldwell-Clarke and Jase Riley dropped into the Mitten State and promptly turned snowbanks, roadside signs, diners, and frozen waterfronts into a global stage. What followed was two weeks of joyful chaos, viral stunts, and relentless positivity that put Michigan squarely in front of millions of eyeballs worldwide.

From Border Signs to Snowstorms: The Stunts That Hooked the Internet



The duo’s Michigan run wasn’t scripted tourism — it was spontaneous, cold-weather comedy with heart. Among the moments that blew up online:

  • Border-hopping bravado at Michigan welcome signs, treating snow-covered pull-offs like must-see attractions
  • Winter daredevil antics — plunging hands into snowdrifts, braving subzero winds, and laughing through lake-effect squalls
  • Town-by-town hype — shouting out small cities and locals with the same energy usually reserved for major landmarks
  • Iconic selfies in places most influencers overlook, including frozen harbors, highway rest stops, and neighborhood main streets

Every clip carried the same message: Michigan isn’t just tough — it’s fun.

“Midwest Nice” Goes Global




What really landed wasn’t just the stunts. It was the people.

Josh and Jase leaned hard into what they dubbed “Midwest Nice” — the friendliness of strangers, the generosity of small businesses, and the unfiltered pride locals have for their towns. They filmed chats with residents, joked with shop owners, and turned everyday kindness into shareable moments that traveled far beyond state lines.

For international audiences, Michigan stopped being a flyover mystery and became a place that felt welcoming, weird, and worth the trip.

Real Economic Ripples, Not Just Likes




The impact wasn’t theoretical. It was measurable.

  • Restaurants, coffee shops, and bars featured in videos reported spikes in foot traffic
  • Small towns saw sudden online searches and social engagement jump after being tagged
  • Local tourism pages experienced surges in follows and inquiries
  • Winter travel — often a tough sell — suddenly looked adventurous instead of intimidating

This is the modern tourism multiplier effect: one viral visit can outperform a traditional ad campaign at a fraction of the cost.

Rewriting Michigan’s Global Image



For years, Michigan has fought dated stereotypes — gray skies, factory towns, “nothing to do.” Josh and Jase smashed that narrative by doing something radical: having a blast on camera in the cold.

They showed:

  • Winter as an experience, not an obstacle
  • Small towns as destinations, not detours
  • Locals as the state’s greatest asset

That kind of storytelling sticks — especially with younger travelers planning trips around authenticity instead of brochures.

A Blueprint for Future Tourism

What happened wasn’t luck. It was alignment.

Michigan’s landscapes, culture, and people paired perfectly with creators who thrive on curiosity and connection. The result? A tourism boost that didn’t feel like marketing — it felt like friends showing the world their favorite place.

If state and local tourism leaders are paying attention, the lesson is clear:
Lean into creators who love the moment, the mess, and the people — not just the postcard.

The Verdict



Josh Cauldwell-Clarke and Jase Riley didn’t just visit Michigan.
They sold it — laughing, freezing, pointing at signs, and inviting the world along for the ride.

And if their feeds are any indication, the British Invasion may be over — but Michigan’s moment is just getting started. ❄️πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈπŸ‡¬πŸ‡§











Royal Oak Schools Issues Formal Warning: Federal Immigration Agents Will Not Be Allowed Free Access to Campuses

 

ROYAL OAK, Mich. — Royal Oak Schools has formally established procedures that function as a direct barrier to federal immigration enforcement activitDry on school grounds, making clear that unapproved agents will be treated as unauthorized intruders — not routine visitors.

In a notice delivered to families, the district laid out a strict protocol governing any appearance by Immigration and Customs Enforcement or Customs and Border Protection agents. Under these rules, agents are to be stopped at the perimeter. Entry into school buildings is prohibited unless identity, credentials, and legal authority are fully verified and explicitly approved by district leadership.

Absent that approval, access is denied.

The policy further directs that any verified federal agents are not to conduct business on school campuses at all. Instead, they are to be diverted to the district’s Board Office, where any interaction must occur under the supervision of the superintendent, district legal counsel, and local law enforcement. Classrooms, hallways, and administrative offices are off-limits.

The district states unequivocally that these procedures apply to all federal agents, without exception.

Failure to comply will not be negotiated.

If agents refuse to follow district protocol, Royal Oak Schools authorizes immediate lockdown procedures — the same response reserved for unauthorized or noncompliant individuals who pose a potential threat to student safety.

The policy also treats the timing of enforcement activity as a security issue. Should ICE or CBP agents appear during student drop-off or pick-up, schools are instructed to initiate an immediate lockdown and issue emergency alerts to parents and guardians. The presence of federal agents during these periods is to be handled as an active incident.

District officials confirmed that staff have been trained in emergency response procedures and “Know Your Rights” guidance, reinforcing that compliance with federal authority does not supersede the district’s duty to protect students.

The district did not cite a triggering incident, nor did it specify whether the policy reflects a change from past practice. The absence of explanation does not soften the message. The directive is preventative, explicit, and unmistakable.

Royal Oak Schools has drawn a bright line: school campuses are not enforcement zones. Children are not to be exposed to law enforcement actions unrelated to their education. Any federal presence that disregards these boundaries will be met with lockdowns, legal oversight, and immediate parent notification.

In doing so, the district asserts its authority over school property and signals that student safety — not federal expediency — governs access to its buildings.

Wednesday, January 28, 2026

Former Michigan Democratic Party Treasurer Charged in Alleged Embezzlement Case Involving Elderly Victim

Image
Traci Kornak

  

Image

Image
Dana Nessel 



A longtime political figure in Michigan is now facing serious criminal charges after prosecutors say she exploited a vulnerable senior for personal financial gain.

Traci Kornak, the former treasurer of the Michigan Democratic Party and a onetime ally of Governor Gretchen Whitmer, has been charged with multiple felony counts tied to the alleged theft of tens of thousands of dollars from an elderly woman in Kent County.

Kent County Prosecutor Chris Becker announced that his office has authorized three criminal charges against Kornak following a multi-year investigation. According to prosecutors, the alleged victim is Rose Burd, an elderly woman described as a vulnerable adult under Michigan law.

The charges include one count of embezzlement from a vulnerable adult involving $50,000 or more but less than $100,000, a second count of embezzlement involving an amount between $1,000 and $20,000, and a third count of false pretenses. If convicted on all counts, Kornak could face a combined maximum prison sentence of up to 25 years, along with significant financial penalties.

Court records indicate the alleged conduct occurred over an extended period, with prosecutors arguing that Kornak abused a position of trust to gain access to Burd’s finances. Authorities have not yet announced an arraignment date, and Kornak has not entered a plea as of this writing.

The case has drawn heightened political attention because of Kornak’s past role within the state Democratic Party and her proximity to top Democratic leadership. Critics have accused Attorney General Dana Nessel of failing to act sooner, alleging that the matter was quietly sidelined for years despite earlier warnings.

State Rep. Jay DeBoyer, chair of the Michigan House Oversight Committee, has held multiple hearings related to the case and praised Becker’s office for ultimately bringing charges forward. DeBoyer has said the prolonged timeline raises serious questions about political favoritism and accountability inside state government.

Much of the public scrutiny surrounding the case stems from years of reporting by journalist Charlie LeDuff, who has repeatedly alleged that top state officials were aware of the accusations long before criminal charges were filed. LeDuff has reported that Kornak continued to hold financial responsibilities within Democratic political circles even after concerns were raised.

According to those reports, Kornak was at one point considered for a judicial appointment, a move that intensified backlash once the allegations became more widely known.

The investigation was eventually taken over by the Kent County Sheriff’s Office, which conducted a lengthy review before referring the case to the prosecutor. Becker’s decision to move forward has been framed by supporters as a belated but necessary step toward restoring public trust.

As the case now heads toward court, it is expected to fuel renewed debate over political accountability, oversight of party officials, and protections for elderly and vulnerable adults. For now, Kornak remains presumed innocent, with prosecutors saying the facts will ultimately be tested in a courtroom rather than the court of public opinion.

Monday, January 26, 2026

Perry Johnson Enters Michigan Governor’s Race, Pledges Self-Funded Campaign

 


Republican businessman Perry Johnson formally entered Michigan’s race for governor on Monday, launching a self-funded campaign and immediately positioning himself as an outsider willing to challenge both Democratic leadership and entrenched political interests in Lansing.

Johnson, a wealthy entrepreneur best known for his quality-control and consulting businesses, announced his candidacy with a message centered on economic growth, government accountability, and education reform, themes he emphasized during previous statewide campaigns.

“I’m running because Michigan is falling behind,” Johnson said in his announcement. “Families are paying more, businesses are leaving, and career politicians aren’t delivering results. I’m willing to put my own resources on the line to fix it.”

A Familiar Name Returns to Statewide Politics

Johnson is no stranger to Michigan voters. He previously ran in the Republican gubernatorial primary in 2022, spending millions of his own money before being disqualified over petition issues — a controversy that continues to resonate within GOP circles.

This time, Johnson’s team says the campaign will be built with strict legal compliance and a fully self-funded structure, allowing him to avoid reliance on political action committees, party donors, or special-interest groups.

Campaign aides say Johnson plans to invest “whatever it takes” to communicate directly with voters statewide.

GOP Field Continues to Take Shape

Johnson’s entry further crowds an already developing Republican field, as multiple candidates position themselves to challenge Democratic control of the governor’s office. With term limits preventing Governor Gretchen Whitmer from running again, both parties see the 2026 race as a pivotal contest for the state’s economic and political direction.

Republican strategists say Johnson’s personal wealth, name recognition, and willingness to self-finance could make him a serious contender — particularly in a primary electorate frustrated with traditional politicians.

However, critics within the party argue that Johnson’s past campaign missteps and outsider status could prove liabilities in a competitive primary.

Campaign Message Focused on Economy and Education

Johnson has signaled that his platform will emphasize:

  • Cutting regulations he says drive jobs out of Michigan

  • Expanding school choice and restructuring education funding

  • Opposing tax increases and what he calls “runaway state spending”

  • Reining in executive power and restoring legislative oversight

He is expected to begin a statewide tour immediately, focusing on small businesses, manufacturing communities, and suburban voters.

High-Stakes Race Ahead

With Michigan emerging as a national battleground state, the governor’s race is expected to draw intense attention, heavy spending, and national political interest.

Johnson’s decision to self-fund could reshape the Republican primary, forcing other candidates to rely more heavily on donor networks and party infrastructure — and potentially accelerating the pace and intensity of the race.

As the field continues to solidify, Johnson’s entry underscores what many operatives already expect: Michigan’s 2026 governor’s race will be one of the most expensive and closely watched state contests in the country.

Sunday, January 25, 2026

John James Draws Fire After Breaking With Michigan Republicans on Auto Mandate



U.S. Rep. John James is facing renewed scrutiny from within his own party after voting alongside Michigan Democrats to preserve a Biden-era federal auto technology mandate — a move critics say underscores growing concerns about his alignment with Republican priorities.

James’ vote placed him with Democratic members of Michigan’s congressional delegation, including Haley Stevens and Shri Thanedar, and against every other Michigan Republican in the U.S. House, who supported blocking the regulation.

Internal GOP Friction Intensifies

The regulation, issued by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration during the Joe Biden administration, requires automakers to install advanced technology designed to prevent impaired driving. While supporters argue the rule could save lives, opponents warn it opens the door to increased costs, data collection, and federal intrusion into privately owned vehicles.

Following the vote, conservative activists and Republican strategists in Michigan characterized James’ decision as a clear break from party consensus, particularly on regulatory and privacy issues central to the state’s auto industry.

Debate Avoidance Becomes Part of the Narrative

James’ vote has also reignited criticism over his absence from debates and multi-candidate Republican forums, an issue that has followed him through multiple election cycles. Political observers note that while James has maintained a strong media presence through controlled appearances and national fundraising, he has repeatedly declined invitations to participate in open, unscripted debates with other Republicans.

Those decisions have drawn sharp contrast with other prominent Michigan Republicans who have actively engaged voters in public forums and policy debates.

GOP Field Takes Shape Without James

As dissatisfaction grows among some party activists, attention has increasingly shifted to other Republican figures viewed as more closely aligned with grassroots priorities. Among those frequently mentioned are:

  • Mike Cox, emphasizing law-and-order credentials and opposition to federal overreach

  • Tom Leonard, known for legislative experience and confrontations with Democratic leadership

  • Aric Nesbitt, a consistent critic of federal mandates and regulatory expansion

None of these figures were involved in the congressional vote, but party insiders say the contrast in governing philosophy has become more pronounced.

A Defining Moment

James has defended his record as pragmatic and focused on safety and economic growth. However, critics argue the auto mandate vote — combined with his absence from debates — reinforces doubts about whether he represents the priorities of Michigan Republicans or a more bipartisan, Washington-driven approach.

As federal regulations affecting the auto industry move closer to implementation, and as Michigan Republicans assess future leadership, James’ vote is likely to remain a flashpoint in internal party discussions.


Saturday, January 24, 2026

Metro Detroit Doctor, Attorney, and Therapist Charged in Federal Child Exploitation Case



DETROIT — Federal prosecutors have charged three Metro Detroit professionals — a therapist, an attorney, and a medical doctor — in a sweeping child exploitation investigation that uncovered graphic online conversations, alleged admissions of abuse, and the sharing of child sexual abuse material.

According to court filings, the investigation grew out of a separate Federal Bureau of Investigation case in Ohio, where a Toledo-area man was arrested after allegedly attempting to sexually abuse children he believed were real. During that probe, agents discovered extensive chat logs connecting the suspect to men in Michigan.

The messages allegedly included discussions about sexually abusing children as young as four.


Therapist Allegedly Received Child Abuse Videos

Investigators say Jeremy Brian Tacon, a Huntington Woods resident and licensed psychotherapist, exchanged messages with the Toledo suspect that referenced sexual interest in children and requests for illicit material.

Federal affidavits allege Tacon received multiple videos containing child sexual abuse material through encrypted messaging platforms. When agents executed a search warrant at his home in November, they confirmed the phone linked to the chats belonged to him.

Tacon had worked as an independent contractor at Arbor Wellness Center. The clinic said it severed ties with him immediately and stated there was no indication clients were involved or affected.


Detroit Attorney Linked to Multiple Devices and Images

Another individual identified in the chats is Joshua Ronnebaum, a Detroit-based attorney who practiced environmental and immigration law and served on a neighborhood association board.

Court documents allege Ronnebaum discussed drug use, sexual activity, and viewing child sexual abuse material with the Toledo suspect over more than a year. During a November search of his residence, agents reportedly seized 38 electronic storage devices.

One phone was allegedly found active and displaying a prompt asking whether to delete the encrypted messaging app Telegram. Investigators believe this was an attempt to erase evidence during the search.

A second device allegedly contained more than 150 images meeting the federal definition of child pornography, including images involving infants and toddlers.

Authorities also say Ronnebaum described past sexual abuse of minors while living abroad — claims that are now part of the federal case.


Doctor Allegedly Discussed Abuse and Fantasies in Chats

A third suspect, Lincoln Erickson of Farmington Hills, was identified through conversations found on Ronnebaum’s devices.

Erickson, a physical rehabilitation physician and Wayne State University graduate, previously worked at the Detroit Medical Center’s Rehabilitation Institute of Michigan. The hospital confirmed he has been terminated.

Federal filings allege Erickson and Ronnebaum discussed traveling overseas to sexually abuse children and exchanged messages celebrating pedophilia. In one alleged exchange, Erickson described a fantasy involving grooming and abusing a child over many years.

Investigators also allege Erickson claimed to know a father who allowed him to sexually abuse a young child — a statement now under federal scrutiny.

Erickson was arrested at a Detroit hospital where he was serving as a medical resident. Authorities say he admitted to receiving child sexual abuse material he believed to be AI-generated. Searches of his phone allegedly uncovered additional Telegram chats requesting explicit videos.

Court records show Erickson was already on probation stemming from a 2024 domestic violence conviction at the time of his arrest.


Federal Charges and Court Appearances

All three men — Tacon, Ronnebaum, and Erickson — are charged federally with offenses related to possession and distribution of child sexual abuse material. Ronnebaum and Erickson were scheduled to appear in federal court on December 16.


Reporting Abuse and Protecting Children

Federal authorities urge parents, caregivers, and educators to remain vigilant about both online and offline threats to children.

Suspected online child exploitation can be reported to the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children CyberTipline at 1-800-843-5678, which works in coordination with federal and state law enforcement agencies.



Friday, January 23, 2026

Dearborn Community Rallies for Release of Lebanese Father Detained by Federal Immigration Authorities

 



DEARBORN, Mich. — A growing wave of solidarity is emerging in Dearborn as family members and community advocates call for the release of Hassan Hamqa, a Lebanese father of four who has been held in federal immigration detention for more than six months while his legal case remains unresolved.

According to family members, Hamqa has been detained by Immigration and Customs Enforcement since mid-2025. They say his prolonged detention has placed significant emotional and psychological strain on his children and spouse, leaving the household in a constant state of anxiety and uncertainty.

As public support grows, community leaders say the case has become emblematic of broader concerns about prolonged immigration detention without transparency, timelines, or criminal allegations.


What Is Actually Known About Why Hassan Hamqa Was Detained

As of now, no criminal charges have been publicly disclosed against Hamqa. According to statements from his family and community advocates in Dearborn, his detention stems from an immigration-related issue, not a criminal prosecution.

Hamqa was taken into custody during what supporters describe as an administrative immigration enforcement action. Immigration detention is a civil process, not a criminal one — yet it can still result in months or even years of confinement while cases move slowly through immigration courts.

To date, federal authorities have not publicly explained the specific basis for his continued detention.


The Immigration Backstory

Based on information shared by family supporters and community organizers:

  • Hamqa is a Lebanese national who has lived in the United States for years

  • He has deep family, community, and faith-based ties in Dearborn

  • His detention is linked to an immigration status dispute or procedural issue, not allegations of violence or threats to public safety

  • His immigration case remains pending, with no final legal determination

In short, Hamqa has not been convicted of a crime, yet remains detained while navigating the immigration court system.


Why Has He Been Held for Over Six Months?

Advocates point to systemic issues within U.S. immigration enforcement.

Under current law, ICE has broad discretion to detain individuals while their cases are pending — even when:

  • The individual has no criminal history

  • The individual has a stable home, spouse, and children

  • The individual poses no flight risk or safety threat

Immigration proceedings are often delayed by court backlogs, postponed bond hearings, and administrative inertia. In many cases, detainees remain in custody simply because their case has not yet been heard.

Civil liberties advocates argue this creates de facto punishment without conviction.


Family Says Detention Has Taken Heavy Toll

Relatives describe Hamqa as a deeply involved father and an active member of Dearborn’s Lebanese and Arab American community, known for volunteer work and helping others.

His absence, they say, has disrupted daily family life and caused serious emotional distress — particularly for his children, who have struggled with the prolonged separation.

“The uncertainty is the hardest part,” a family representative said. “There’s no clear timeline, no resolution, and no explanation for why he’s still being held while his case is pending.”


Petition Launched as Public Support Grows

In response, the family has launched an online petition calling for Hamqa’s release. The petition emphasizes his clean record, strong community ties, and role as a devoted father, arguing that continued detention serves no public safety purpose.

Supporters say alternatives to detention — such as supervised release, monitoring, or bond — are readily available and would allow Hamqa to return home while his case proceeds.

Local residents, advocacy groups, and faith leaders have amplified the petition through social media and community events, framing the case as part of a broader pattern of prolonged immigration detention without transparency.


What Remains Unknown

Despite months of detention:

  • ICE has not released a detailed public explanation

  • Court filings have not been made public

  • No official criminal allegations have been disclosed

That lack of transparency has fueled outrage and organizing within Dearborn and beyond.


Why This Case Resonates in Dearborn

Dearborn is home to one of the largest Arab and Lebanese American populations in the United States. Many residents see Hamqa’s case as emblematic of:

  • Arbitrary immigration detention

  • Families being torn apart with no timelines

  • Civil detention operating with minimal public accountability

For supporters, the issue transcends politics and centers on basic fairness, due process, and family unity.


Bottom Line

Hassan Hamqa was detained due to an immigration status or procedural issue, not a criminal charge. He remains in custody because the immigration system allows prolonged civil detention while cases crawl through backlogged courts — even when families and communities bear the human cost.

As the months pass, supporters say their demand is simple: transparency, due process, and the chance for a father to be home while his case is fairly adjudicated.

Video: Car Crashes Into Delta Terminal at Detroit Metro Airport, Driver Taken Into Custody



ROMULUS, Mich. A vehicle drove into the Delta Air Lines check in area inside the McNamara Terminal at Detroit Metropolitan Wayne County Airport in Romulus, Michigan, authorities confirmed late Saturday.

According to preliminary reports and witness accounts, a Mercedes Benz crashed through the terminal entrance and came to a stop inside the Delta ticketing lobby. Video shared on social media shows the vehicle inside the terminal near passenger check in counters.

Officials have not yet released a motive for the incident. Witnesses reported hearing a loud crash as the vehicle broke through barriers while airport employees and travelers were nearby. Some witnesses stated the driver exited the vehicle shortly after the crash and was taken into custody by airport police without further incident.

Emergency responders arrived quickly and secured the area. Several people were evaluated at the scene for minor injuries. Authorities said no serious injuries or fatalities have been confirmed.

The Wayne County Airport Authority Police Department is leading the investigation. Officials stated that more details will be released as the investigation continues.

Despite the incident, airport operations were not fully shut down. Travelers experienced delays and disruptions near the affected check in area as crews worked to clear debris and assess damage.

Airport officials said security and access procedures will be reviewed following the crash to determine how the vehicle was able to enter the terminal area.




Lawsuit Paints Damning Picture of Discrimination Inside Benson’s Office

WAYNE COUNTY, Mich.  — A newly filed civil lawsuit is leveling serious accusations against the Michigan Department of State, alleging that racial discrimination was not only present under Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson, but ignored, enabled, and allowed to metastasize within her administration.

Filed January 12 in Wayne County Circuit Court, the lawsuit was brought by four current and former department employees who allege they were treated differently because they are Black — targeted for discipline, subjected to heightened scrutiny, and denied advancement while other employees were allegedly shielded from similar treatment.

The plaintiffs — David Murray, Elvine Vanbolden, Mychael Foster, and former department official Nirva Civilus — describe a workplace where accountability flowed downward but favoritism flowed up, and where race allegedly played a decisive role in who was investigated, punished, or quietly pushed aside.

According to the complaint, Benson’s office failed at the most basic level of governance: there was no effective system to track discriminatory practices, no meaningful mechanism to correct them, and no internal safeguards to prevent bias from influencing management decisions.

“Defendants have no effective system in place to track, correct, or prevent this unlawful discriminatory conduct,” the complaint states.

That failure, the lawsuit argues, was not incidental — it was structural.

Adding weight to the allegations are sworn statements from former Assistant Secretary of State Heaster Wheeler, who is not a plaintiff but provided testimony describing internal policies so vague and inconsistently applied that they effectively invited biased enforcement. Wheeler said the lack of clarity and accountability inside the department factored directly into his decision to leave.

For critics, that testimony is particularly damning: when senior leadership exits citing internal dysfunction, it undercuts claims that discrimination complaints are merely misunderstandings or isolated grievances.

This lawsuit also follows a familiar and troubling pattern. Less than two years ago, the State of Michigan paid a $775,000 separation agreement to another employee after similar discrimination allegations emerged — a payout that raised questions about whether taxpayer money was being used to bury systemic problems rather than fix them.

Now, those same issues have resurfaced, this time with multiple plaintiffs, sworn statements from former executives, and detailed allegations describing a workplace culture allegedly hostile to equal treatment under Benson’s leadership.

Benson’s office has dismissed the lawsuit as “absolutely false,” asserting that department policies are clear, uniformly enforced, and intolerant of discrimination or retaliation. But the accumulating record — repeated lawsuits, corroborating testimony, and costly settlements — is beginning to strain the credibility of those denials.

No court has yet ruled on the claims, which remain allegations. Still, the lawsuit places Benson squarely at the center of a growing controversy, one that challenges her public image as a steward of fairness and transparency and raises the question of whether her office practiced internally what it demanded of others.

As the case moves forward, the issue is no longer whether these allegations are politically inconvenient — but whether Michigan’s top election official presided over an agency where discrimination was allowed to persist, uncorrected and unchallenged, on her watch.


Michigan GOP Alleges Conflicts of Interest Involving Attorney General Dana Nessel

 

Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel is facing accusations from the Michigan Republican Party, which claims she engaged in conflicts of interest by intervening—or appearing to intervene—in criminal matters involving a political ally and her spouse.

The allegations were raised publicly during a legislative hearing and have since fueled a broader partisan and ethical debate over the proper boundaries of the state’s top law enforcement official.

What Are the Allegations?

According to testimony presented by Republican-affiliated attorneys, Nessel is accused of actions that, they argue, created at least the appearance of impropriety in two separate situations:

  1. Inquiry into an Investigation Involving a Political Ally
    GOP attorneys testified that Nessel asked to be kept informed about a criminal investigation involving Traci Kornak, a former Michigan Democratic Party treasurer who also served on Nessel’s attorney general transition team.

    Republicans argue that Nessel’s request to receive updates—despite not being directly assigned to the matter—could be seen as inappropriate given Kornak’s political ties and prior relationship with Nessel.

  2. Contact with the Secretary of State Regarding a Case Involving Nessel’s Spouse
    The GOP further alleges that Nessel contacted Jocelyn Benson to discuss a criminal investigation involving Nessel’s wife.

    While details of the conversation have not been fully disclosed publicly, Republicans argue that any involvement by the attorney general in matters touching her immediate family raises serious ethical red flags—even if no formal directive or interference occurred.

What Was Said at the Legislative Hearing?

At the legislative hearing, Republican attorneys framed their concerns around process and ethics, not necessarily outcomes. They emphasized that the attorney general’s office has extraordinary power over investigations and prosecutions, and that even informal communications or requests for updates can exert influence—real or perceived—on staff and partner agencies.

Their argument centers on the principle that justice must not only be impartial but must also appear impartial.

Nessel’s Response and Democratic Pushback

Nessel and her supporters have pushed back strongly against the accusations, characterizing them as politically motivated and misleading. Democratic allies argue that:

  • Attorneys general routinely receive briefings on a wide range of matters within their department.

  • Requesting information does not equate to directing, altering, or interfering with an investigation.

  • There is no evidence that any case outcome was changed or influenced as a result of Nessel’s actions.

Supporters also note that recusal rules and internal firewalls exist within the attorney general’s office to prevent improper involvement, particularly in cases involving personal or political connections.

Why This Matters

The controversy touches on a fundamental issue in democratic governance: trust in the independence of law enforcement.

Attorneys general are expected to enforce the law without favoritism, regardless of party affiliation, political alliances, or personal relationships. Even the perception that investigations could be influenced by political or familial considerations can erode public confidence—especially in a highly polarized political climate.

For Republicans, the issue is about accountability and ethical standards. For Democrats, it is about resisting what they view as an attempt to weaponize oversight hearings for political gain.

What Happens Next?

At this stage, the allegations remain claims, not findings. No court has ruled that Nessel violated the law, and no formal ethics sanction has been imposed. However, the issue may continue to be examined through:

  • Additional legislative oversight hearings

  • Requests for internal communications or records

  • Potential ethics reviews or referrals

As Michigan heads into future election cycles, the dispute is likely to remain a flashpoint in the ongoing battle over transparency, power, and public trust in state government.


Sterling Heights Mayor Breaks With Federal Immigration Enforcement, Citing Constitutional Concerns

 


Image


Sterling Heights, Michigan — In a sharply worded address at a city council meeting on January 20, Mayor Michael C. Taylor delivered one of his strongest public rebukes yet of federal immigration enforcement practices, accusing the current administration of disregarding constitutional protections and instilling fear in local communities.

Taylor, a former Republican who now identifies as an independent, said he would not allow Sterling Heights to become complicit in what he described as the “terrorizing” of peaceful residents through aggressive immigration actions. His comments were aimed squarely at federal deportation efforts and the growing role of local law enforcement in immigration-related detentions.

Triggered by a Local Traffic Stop

The mayor’s remarks were not abstract. He pointed directly to a January 9 traffic stop in which three passengers were reportedly detained until Border Patrol agents arrived to take them into custody. According to Taylor, none of the passengers were accused of committing a crime.

“That incident crossed a line,” the mayor said, arguing that detaining individuals solely to facilitate federal immigration enforcement raises serious constitutional questions.

He went further, stating that the “current regime” has shown indifference toward both the Constitution and longstanding legal norms — language rarely used by a sitting mayor in Sterling Heights.

Proposed Policy Shifts

Beyond rhetoric, Taylor outlined concrete policy changes he wants the city to pursue:

  • Police Guidance on Rights: Sterling Heights police would be instructed to inform passengers who are not accused of a crime that they have constitutional rights, including the right not to provide identification.

  • Limits on Federal Cooperation: Taylor said he wants to pause or reevaluate partnerships with federal agencies — including Federal Bureau of Investigation — if those partnerships risk violating residents’ civil liberties.

  • Clear Separation from ICE Enforcement: While not declaring the city a “sanctuary,” the mayor made clear he does not want local police acting as a holding arm for Immigration and Customs Enforcement when no criminal charges are involved.

Why It Matters in Sterling Heights

Sterling Heights is one of Michigan’s largest cities and among its most diverse. Approximately 27 percent of residents were born outside the United States, making immigration policy a lived issue rather than a distant political debate.

“When the mayor of a city this size says ‘I won’t have it,’ that matters,” one resident said after the meeting. “It sends a signal to both law enforcement and the community.”

A Shift After Decades in Office

Taylor emphasized that his stance represents a change in approach after decades of public service.

“I’ve been mayor for the last 11 years. I’ve been on the city council for 16 years,” he said. “For most of that time, I assumed we had a functioning federal government that cared about the rights of the people in this country.”

He added that recent events have forced him to reconsider that assumption and to take a more active role in how local police interact with federal authorities.

A Growing Local–Federal Divide

The mayor’s comments place Sterling Heights among a growing number of cities where local leaders are openly questioning the constitutionality of federal immigration enforcement tactics — particularly when local police are drawn into civil immigration matters.

Whether Taylor’s proposed changes will face legal challenges or pushback from state or federal officials remains to be seen. But his message was unmistakable: Sterling Heights, he says, will not trade constitutional rights for cooperation.

As national debates over immigration enforcement intensify, the confrontation unfolding in this Michigan suburb highlights a broader tension — one between federal power and local responsibility, and between enforcement priorities and civil liberties.

Monday, January 19, 2026

Massive 100-Plus Vehicle Pileup Shuts Down I-196 in Zeeland Township Amid Snow, Whiteout Conditions



Zeeland Township, MI — January 19, 2026 — A major multi-vehicle collision involving more than 100 cars and trucks brought large sections of Interstate 196 to a standstill Monday morning as dangerous winter weather slammed West Michigan.

Drivers encountered hazardous snow, high winds, and sudden whiteout conditions that made visibility nearly impossible, triggering a chain-reaction crash that stretched across multiple lanes of the highway.

Crash Unfolds in Treacherous Winter Weather

The pileup began around 10:19 a.m. near 64th Avenue in Zeeland Township, southeast of Grand Rapids. Heavy lake-effect snow combined with blowing winds created near-zero visibility, leaving drivers little time to react as traffic slowed and vehicles began colliding.

Authorities confirmed that more than 100 vehicles were involved, including an estimated 30 to 40 semi-trucks, many of which jackknifed on the icy roadway. The crash scene quickly grew as additional vehicles slid into already disabled traffic.

Emergency officials reported multiple injuries, with first responders treating victims at the scene and transporting others to nearby hospitals. As of the latest updates, no fatalities have been reported.




Highway Closure and Evacuations

Both eastbound and westbound lanes of I-196 were shut down between the Hudsonville and Zeeland exits as crews worked to clear wreckage and assist stranded motorists. Officials warned the closure could last several hours due to the scale of the crash and ongoing weather conditions.

With temperatures in the low teens and snow continuing to fall, drivers were instructed to remain inside their vehicles until they could be safely evacuated. School buses and public transit vehicles were brought in to transport motorists off the highway to a nearby high school, where they were given a warm place to wait and arrange transportation home.

Weather and Travel Advisory

Authorities urged residents to avoid unnecessary travel across West Michigan as the winter storm continued to produce heavy snowfall, strong winds, and whiteout conditions. Drivers were warned that even short trips could quickly turn dangerous as roads iced over and visibility dropped without warning.

State police emphasized that road conditions can change rapidly during lake-effect snow events, urging motorists to slow down, increase following distances, and stay off highways if possible.

Community and Emergency Response

Local fire departments, ambulance crews, and law enforcement seeing coordinated response worked throughout the afternoon to rescue motorists, treat injuries, and begin the long process of clearing the highway. School staff and community partners assisted with shelter and transportation, helping ensure stranded drivers were safe and warm.

The incident remains under investigation as cleanup efforts continue and officials assess the full impact of the storm on regional travel.




Friday, January 16, 2026

Macomb County Clerk Sounds Alarm Over Non-Citizens on Jury Pools, Voter Rolls — Calls Out State Incompetence

 


MACOMB COUNTY, Mich. — Macomb County Clerk Anthony Forlini says what his office uncovered should set off alarms across Michigan: non-U.S. citizens appearing in jury pools, showing up in the voter registry, and in some cases serving on juries or casting ballots.

Forlini, a Republican candidate seeking to replace Democrat Jocelyn Benson as Michigan Secretary of State, says the findings point to systemic failure at the state level—and raises the question of whether the problem is mere incompetence or an intentional refusal to fix known flaws.

“This Should Never Happen”

Michigan law is clear: only U.S. citizens may vote or serve on juries. Yet Forlini says names of non-citizens are routinely pulled into jury summons because the state relies heavily on driver’s license and state ID databases without adequate citizenship filtering.

“These are not obscure edge cases,” Forlini said, arguing that the volume his office encountered shows a breakdown in basic eligibility checks. Critics say that if local clerks can identify the issue, the state has no excuse for failing to fix it.

Jury Pools Built on a Flawed System

Michigan assembles jury pools using state driver’s license and ID records—documents that lawful non-citizens are allowed to obtain. The state has long known this creates a risk of ineligible jurors being summoned, yet no meaningful safeguard has been implemented, according to county officials.

For conservatives and election-integrity advocates, that raises a hard question: Why hasn’t the state closed the loophole?

Voter Registry Concerns Go Further

Even more troubling, Forlini says some of the same non-citizens flagged through jury records also appear in Michigan’s Qualified Voter File, and some cast ballots.

State officials insist such cases are “rare,” but critics argue that any number above zero is unacceptable—and that downplaying the problem only erodes public trust. They say a system that allows non-citizens onto voter rolls is not a secure system, regardless of scale.

Incompetence or Intent?

For years, Republican lawmakers and clerks have urged stronger citizenship verification and tighter coordination between databases. Those calls, Forlini argues, were ignored by the Michigan Department of State under Benson’s leadership.

“To conservatives, this looks less like an oversight and more like willful neglect,” said one election watchdog. “When you know a system is broken and choose not to fix it, that’s not neutral administration.”

The Michigan Department of State maintains that it investigates allegations of improper voting and refers cases to law enforcement when appropriate. But critics say after-the-fact investigations are no substitute for prevention.

A Campaign Built on Accountability

Forlini says his campaign is about restoring basic standards and accountability—verifying citizenship before jury service or voting eligibility, cleaning voter rolls aggressively, and ending what he calls a culture of denial in Lansing.

“This isn’t about suppressing voters,” Forlini said. “It’s about following the law and protecting the integrity of the system for every lawful voter.”

As Michigan heads toward another high-stakes election cycle, Forlini’s revelations are fueling renewed debate over whether election administration under Democratic leadership has been careless—or deliberately permissive.

Either way, conservatives argue, the public deserves answers—and immediate reform.3

Michigan Judge Blocks $645 Million Work Project Spending in Legal Win for GOP House


LANSING, Mich. — A Michigan judge has temporarily blocked the state from spending $645 million in disputed work project funds, delivering an early court victory to the Republican-led Michigan House of Representatives.

Michigan Court of Claims Chief Judge Michael F. Gadola issued a preliminary injunction Thursday afternoon, preventing the state from moving forward with the spending while a broader legal challenge plays out in court.

Court Finds Likely Constitutional Violation

In his ruling, Judge Gadola determined that House Republicans demonstrated a likelihood of success on the merits of their lawsuit and would suffer irreparable harm if the court did not intervene. The decision effectively freezes the use of the funds until the legal dispute is resolved.

The lawsuit centers on whether the state executive branch overstepped its authority by reallocating or spending work project funds without proper legislative approval, raising serious questions about separation of powers under Michigan’s Constitution.

Decision Comes Faster Than Expected

The injunction was issued just hours after a court hearing earlier in the day, during which Gadola had indicated a ruling on a temporary restraining order might not arrive until mid-next week. Instead, the judge moved swiftly, signaling the urgency of the constitutional issues involved.

Political and Budgetary Implications

Republican lawmakers argue the spending undermines the Legislature’s constitutional role in budget oversight and sets a dangerous precedent for executive control over state funds. The injunction preserves the status quo and prevents the money from being spent while the court reviews the case in full.

State officials have not yet issued a public response, and it remains unclear whether the administration will appeal the ruling or seek an expedited review.

What Happens Next

The case is expected to continue in the coming weeks and could have wide-ranging implications for how Michigan handles budget transfers, work project authorizations, and legislative oversight of state spending.

For now, the $645 million remains frozen — and the legal fight over who controls Michigan’s purse strings is far from over.




Michigan Drivers Face Stricter Enforcement as Speed Cameras Roll Out in Work Zones




Image

Michigan drivers should brace for tougher enforcement in construction zones as the state prepares to roll out speed cameras aimed at protecting road crews and reducing crashes.

While the cameras are not active yet, officials say installation is expected to begin soon. Once operational, the cameras will only be used in clearly marked Michigan Department of Transportation (MDOT) construction zones and only when construction workers are present on site.

The change comes under bipartisan legislation recently signed into law by Governor Gretchen Whitmer, allowing automated speed enforcement in work zones where workers face daily risks from speeding and distracted drivers.

How the Program Will Work

According to state lawmakers, drivers will be warned well in advance. Speed camera zones will be clearly posted to notify motorists that enforcement is in effect.

State Rep. Alabas Farhat, a Democrat who supported the measure, said the goal is safety—not revenue.

“Thousands of accidents are happening on our highways because of reckless driving and speeding, dozens of people that have been killed last year alone on the highways,” Farhat said. “That’s our goal—to bring those numbers down.”

Under the law:

  • Cameras activate only when workers are present

  • Drivers caught going 10 mph or more over the speed limit face escalating penalties

    • First offense: Violation notice

    • Second offense: $150 fine

    • Third offense: $300 ticket

Mixed Reactions From Drivers

Public reaction has been divided. Many drivers say protecting construction workers is essential, but some argue that speed cameras go too far, raising concerns about surveillance and fairness.

Republican State Rep. Matt Maddock has voiced skepticism about the program’s execution.

“These cameras aren’t calibrated. They won’t be taken down when construction stops, and they won’t stop operating when workers aren’t present,” Maddock said. “It’s just another tool to funnel taxpayer dollars.”

Supporters of the law counter that the statute explicitly limits camera use to active work zones and requires advance signage to ensure transparency.

Timeline for Implementation

The Michigan Department of Transportation says it aims to begin installing the cameras later this year. However, officials caution that full statewide implementation will take time, with broader rollout more likely in 2027.

State leaders stress that the program is designed to change driver behavior, not catch motorists by surprise.

As Michigan continues to rebuild and modernize its roads, the debate now shifts to whether automated enforcement will make work zones safer—or further strain trust between drivers and the state.

Thursday, January 15, 2026

Fox 2 Anchor Taryn Asher Has Been Off the Air for More Than Two Months — and Management Isn’t Saying Why

 Image

Image


Image


DETROIT — One of Fox 2’s most familiar faces has quietly vanished from the nightly newscast — and the station isn’t explaining what’s going on.

Taryn Asher, a longtime Fox 2 anchor, has not appeared on air since early November. Viewers noticed her absence weeks ago, but station leadership has remained publicly silent.

Sources familiar with the situation tell Deadline Detroit that Asher has been suspended following an incident in which she allegedly yelled at her co-anchor Roop Raj, news director Brooks Blanton, and her producer. Sources say it’s unclear whether the confrontation happened once or more than once.

Still Listed, Still Promoted — Just Not On Air

Adding to the confusion, Fox 2 continues to feature Asher in promotional spots during newscasts. She also remains listed on the station’s website as an evening anchor for the 5 p.m., 6 p.m., and 10 p.m. broadcasts, as well as The Edge. Sources say she still has a desk inside the Fox 2 newsroom in Southfield.

What viewers haven’t been told is whether Asher is expected to return — or when.

A Big Seat in Detroit TV

Asher officially became a Fox 2 co-anchor in 2022, joining Raj after the retirement of longtime Detroit news fixtures Huel Perkins and Monica Gayle. Replacing the popular duo put immediate pressure on the new anchor team in one of the city’s most-watched news slots.

A Fenton native and a 1997 graduate of Michigan State University, Asher joined Fox 2 in 2007 after spending seven years at WJRT-TV. Earlier in her career, she worked at WLNS, steadily climbing the ranks of Michigan television news.

Silence Raises More Questions

With no official explanation from Fox 2, Asher’s prolonged absence has become the subject of growing speculation among viewers and media insiders alike. The lack of transparency — combined with her continued presence in station promotions — has only fueled questions about her status.

For now, Fox 2’s audience is left with a familiar name, an empty anchor chair, and no answers about when — or if — Taryn Asher will return to Detroit’s nightly news.

Iron Pig Smokehouse Cordon Sparks Renewed Legal Clash With Michigan Attorney General

  GAYLORD, Mich. — Iron Pig Smokehouse’s downtown location was cordoned off with police tape late Wednesday night, reigniting a long-runnin...