Cox Calls for Investigation, Transparency Into Benson’s Ties to Southern Poverty Law Center

LIVONIA, Mich. — April 27, 2026 — Former Michigan Attorney General Mike Cox is calling for an investigation and expanded public disclosure regarding Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson and her past affiliation with the Southern Poverty Law Center.

Cox, who previously served as attorney general and spent more than two decades as a prosecutor, announced Monday that he has filed a Freedom of Information Act request seeking records of communications between Benson, the Michigan Department of State, and the Southern Poverty Law Center, often referred to as the SPLC.

The request, according to Cox, seeks emails, internal communications, and other records connected to Benson’s tenure on the organization’s board. Cox also urged Benson to voluntarily release additional materials beyond the scope of the request, including notes, calendars, and other documentation tied to her time with the group.

Cox’s call comes amid claims that the SPLC is facing a federal indictment tied to alleged financial misconduct, including accusations of fraud, false statements, and money laundering. He pointed to the overlap between the timeframe referenced in the alleged indictment and Benson’s service on the organization’s board as a basis for further scrutiny.

“As a former attorney general, I know the difference between political noise and serious public corruption concerns. This is serious,” Cox said in a statement. “This federal indictment raises obvious questions: What did Jocelyn Benson know? When did she know it? And did her relationship with SPLC continue into her work as Michigan Secretary of State?”

Cox added that, in his view, full transparency is necessary to address public concerns.

“The public deserves full transparency into her time on the board and her time running Michigan’s elections,” he said. “If there is nothing to hide, release the records.”

Benson’s office has not yet publicly responded to Cox’s request or the allegations referenced in his statement.

The Southern Poverty Law Center, a nonprofit known for tracking hate groups and litigating civil rights cases, has not issued a public statement addressing the claims of a federal indictment referenced by Cox.

As of Monday, no independent confirmation of the alleged indictment had been immediately verified through publicly available federal court records.

The situation remains developing.

Cox Campaign Accuses John James of Deceptive Fundraising Texts in Michigan Governor’s Race

 

LANSING, Mich. — A new political flashpoint has erupted in Michigan’s already heated gubernatorial race, as the campaign of former Attorney General Mike Cox is accusing Republican rival John James of misleading voters through a controversial fundraising text message.

The dispute centers on a mass text sent to Michigan voters claiming to support efforts to “hold Michigan for Trump,” while promoting a so-called “10X impact” on donations. The message suggested that small contributions would be multiplied — for example, a $10 donation becoming $100 — and directed recipients to a fundraising link.

Cox’s campaign alleges that the message is deceptive, arguing that there is no actual donation-matching program in place and that funds raised through the link are directed solely to James’ campaign — not to any broader effort tied to former President Donald Trump or national party operations.

“This is not just misleading — it’s a bait-and-switch,” Cox allies said in statements posted online. “Voters are being led to believe their money is going toward a coordinated effort tied to President Trump, when in reality it appears to benefit only one campaign.”

Dispute Over “10X Impact” Claims

At the center of the controversy is the use of “matching” language — a common but tightly scrutinized tactic in political fundraising. According to guidance previously circulated by Trump-aligned fundraising committees and the Republican National Committee, campaigns are discouraged from using language that implies donations will be multiplied unless such programs are clearly defined and legitimate.

Cox’s campaign points to those guidelines, arguing that the “10X impact” messaging violates both the spirit and, potentially, the rules governing political fundraising solicitations tied to Trump’s name and likeness.

Screenshots shared by Cox’s team also show that the donation page linked in the text appears to route contributions directly to John James’ campaign, with no visible indication of a matching fund or broader allocation.

No Public Confirmation From Trump

Another key point of contention is the absence of any public endorsement or authorization from Trump or his affiliated committees for the fundraising effort described in the text.

Cox’s campaign argues that invoking Trump in the solicitation — without clear authorization or financial participation — creates a false impression of coordination.

“There has been no notice, no confirmation, and no evidence that President Trump or his team is involved in this,” Cox supporters claim. “That makes the message even more problematic.”

James Campaign Yet to Respond

As of now, the James campaign has not issued a detailed public response to the allegations. It remains unclear whether the campaign will dispute the claims, clarify the “10X impact” language, or defend the fundraising approach as standard political marketing.

Political analysts note that aggressive digital fundraising tactics — including urgent language, countdown timers, and matching claims — have become increasingly common across both parties. However, they also warn that such tactics can blur ethical lines if not clearly explained to donors.

Broader Implications in Tight Race

The controversy comes at a critical moment in the Michigan governor’s race, where fundraising and grassroots support are key indicators of campaign strength. Accusations of deceptive practices could carry political risk, particularly among core Republican voters who prioritize transparency and alignment with Trump.

Cox’s campaign is leaning into the issue, framing it as a matter of trust.

“If you received this text, you should know exactly where your money is going,” a campaign-aligned message stated. “Voters deserve honesty — not gimmicks.”

Whether the dispute gains traction with voters — or fades as another flashpoint in a contentious primary — may depend on how quickly and clearly the James campaign responds.

Michigan Gubernatorial Candidates Clash Over Data Centers as Absences Take Center Stage

 

LANSING, Mich. — What was intended to be a policy-focused forum on data centers quickly turned into a broader referendum on candidate accountability, as several high-profile contenders — most notably John James — skipped a key event hosted by the Michigan Press Association.

While multiple Republican candidates and one Democrat appeared to outline detailed positions on the future of data centers in Michigan, the absence of top-tier names left a noticeable void — and drew pointed criticism from both attendees and political observers.

Republicans Outline Competing Visions

Former Attorney General Mike Cox stressed local control, arguing communities should decide whether to allow data centers but only if developers meet strict requirements, including generating their own energy to avoid burdening residents and businesses.

Businessman Perry Johnson emerged as one of the most policy-focused voices, framing the issue around Michigan’s economic future. He warned that rising energy costs are already “unbearable” and proposed limiting rate increases to inflation while requiring developers to invest in infrastructure.

Johnson also raised concerns about transparency involving Democratic frontrunner Jocelyn Benson, drawing attention to potential conflicts tied to a proposed data center project connected to her husband’s business dealings.

Senate Minority Leader Aric Nesbitt took a hard line against taxpayer subsidies, arguing Michigan should stop handing out incentives to large tech companies and instead prioritize infrastructure and tax relief.

Swanson, Rebandt Offer Contrasting Views

Genesee County Sheriff Chris Swanson, the lone Democrat present, criticized the rollout of data center projects, arguing residents have been excluded from decision-making and calling for a structured, transparent zoning approach.

Pastor Ralph Rebandt opposed data centers outright, citing environmental risks and a history of failed corporate subsidy deals.

John James Absence Draws Sharper Criticism

But the most pointed criticism of the day centered on who wasn’t in the room.

John James — long viewed as a Republican frontrunner — did not attend, citing obligations in Washington. However, his absence is increasingly being framed by critics as part of a broader pattern rather than a one-off scheduling conflict.

Opponents argue James has been largely missing in action during key moments of the gubernatorial race, avoiding direct engagement in forums and debates where voters expect candidates to defend their positions.

That criticism is compounded by scrutiny over his record in Congress, where detractors point to missed votes and limited visibility during critical legislative periods. For a candidate seeking to lead the state, critics argue, the perception of inconsistency — both in Lansing and Washington — raises legitimate questions about accessibility and accountability.

In a race where many voters remain undecided, the contrast was difficult to ignore: candidates on stage answering questions in real time, while one of the most recognizable names in the field was absent from the discussion entirely.

Supporters of James maintain that his congressional duties require his attention and note his past electoral strength. But politically, the optics of skipping a major statewide forum — particularly on a defining issue like data centers — handed his opponents an opportunity to question whether he is willing to show up when it matters most.

Other Key Absences

James was not alone. Benson and independent candidate Mike Duggan also did not attend, further fueling criticism that some of the race’s biggest names are avoiding unscripted, policy-driven settings.

Race Remains Wide Open

The forum came amid shifting dynamics in the race, including the withdrawal of former House Speaker Tom Leonard and tightening polling in the Republican primary, where Johnson has been gaining momentum.

With Michigan’s governorship historically alternating between parties and a three-way general election likely, the stakes are high — and so is voter scrutiny.

More Than Policy — A Test of Presence

While data centers remain a critical policy issue — touching on energy, infrastructure, and economic development — Thursday’s forum underscored something equally important to voters: who is willing to show up, take questions, and be held accountable.

For candidates who attended, it was an opportunity to lead the conversation. For those who didn’t, especially James, it may raise a more fundamental question that could follow them through the campaign:

If you’re not in the room now, will you be there when it counts?

Michigan Demands Answers After Antrim County Clerk Accused of Improperly Altering Voter Records

 

ANTRIM COUNTY, Mich. — State election officials are investigating whether the Antrim County clerk improperly canceled or altered voter registrations, raising new concerns about election administration in a county that has remained under intense scrutiny since the 2020 presidential election.

According to the Michigan Bureau of Elections, Clerk Victoria Bishop may have taken actions that exceeded her legal authority by issuing voter cancellation notices and modifying records in the state’s Qualified Voter File, commonly known as the QVF.

In a formal letter sent earlier this month, Bureau Director Jonathan Brater stated that the agency had received reports from voters and local officials about “concerning activity” tied to Bishop’s office. A subsequent review of the QVF revealed what officials described as “sufficient irregularities” to warrant further investigation.

Allegations of Improper Cancellations

At the center of the dispute is whether Bishop improperly targeted voters who had not participated in recent elections. State officials say evidence suggests cancellation or confirmation notices were sent to individuals who missed one or two major election cycles.

Under Michigan law, however, voter registrations cannot be canceled solely for failing to vote.

The Bureau also alleges that Bishop may have:

• Changed voter statuses in the QVF to “Cancel” or “Reject” without proper authorization

• Failed to independently verify voter information before taking action

• Acted without delegation from city or township clerks, who are legally responsible for maintaining voter rolls

State officials emphasized that county clerks do not have unilateral authority to conduct voter maintenance or directly alter registration statuses in the statewide system.

Bishop Defends “Corrective Audit”

Bishop, a Republican elected in 2024, has defended her actions, describing them as part of a “corrective audit” aimed at improving the accuracy of voter rolls.

She argues that sending notices to voters was intended to prompt verification and ensure outdated registrations—such as those belonging to deceased individuals or people who have moved—are addressed. Bishop has also said that maintaining accurate voter rolls is essential to restoring public confidence in elections.

In public statements, she has framed her actions as a response to what she describes as past administrative failures, particularly during the 2020 election cycle.

Bishop is married to Randy Bishop, a conservative talk radio personality often known as “Trucker Randy,” who has publicly promoted claims that the 2020 election was stolen.

Potential Legal Consequences

The Bureau of Elections has ordered Bishop to provide a detailed explanation of her actions, including a list of affected voters and justification for any changes made in the QVF.

Failure to comply could carry serious consequences. State officials noted that:

• Election duties could be reassigned or removed

• Violations of lawful directives may result in misdemeanor charges

Michigan has previously taken similar action against local clerks accused of violating election law, including temporarily stripping authority in high-profile cases.

Antrim County’s Ongoing Election Spotlight

This latest controversy unfolds in Antrim County, a northern Michigan community that became nationally known following the 2020 election. At that time, a reporting error briefly showed incorrect presidential results due to a tabulator update issue, which was later corrected.

Despite the correction, the incident fueled widespread claims of election fraud and placed the county at the center of ongoing political and legal debates about election integrity.

Bishop campaigned on addressing those concerns, pledging to clean up voter rolls and strengthen confidence in the system. Her election reflected continued skepticism among some voters about the accuracy of election administration.

What Comes Next

The Bureau’s investigation is ongoing, and Bishop faces a deadline to respond with documentation and explanations of her actions. The outcome could determine whether the issue remains an administrative dispute or escalates into formal legal proceedings.

As Michigan prepares for upcoming elections, the case underscores the tension between efforts to ensure voter roll accuracy and the legal safeguards designed to protect voter access.

Tom Leonard Ends Michigan Gubernatorial Bid, Citing Principles and Path Forward

 

Former state House Speaker Tom Leonard announced Thursday that he is withdrawing from the race for governor, saying the decision came after months of reflection on the direction of the campaign and the standards he was unwilling to compromise.

In a statement, Leonard said his campaign had spent the past 10 months traveling across Michigan, meeting voters, and promoting what he described as “bold, positive leadership focused on real solutions.” He credited family members, staff, and supporters for sustaining the effort, expressing gratitude for their time, energy, and encouragement.

“This wasn’t an easy decision,” Leonard said, adding that the move followed “an honest look at the path forward” as the race evolved.

Leonard emphasized that continuing in the contest would have required changes to his campaign approach and personal values, which he said he was unwilling to make. “I’m not willing to compromise who I am or how I believe this campaign should be run in order to win,” he said.

The withdrawal comes as the gubernatorial race in Michigan continues to take shape ahead of the November election, with candidates across both major parties working to consolidate support and define their platforms. Political observers note that departures at this stage can shift the dynamics of a competitive primary field.

Despite ending his bid, Leonard indicated he plans to remain active in public policy and advocacy. “While this chapter is closing, we are not going anywhere when it comes to fighting for the issues that matter,” he said.

Leonard also called for unity moving forward, urging voters and leaders to focus on shared priorities as the election approaches.

No immediate endorsement of another candidate was announced.

Michigan Democrats Nominate Eli Savit for Attorney General Amid Party Tensions

 

Eli Savit Facebook 

DETROIT MICHIGAN — Michigan Democrats on Sunday selected Eli Savit as their nominee for attorney general, choosing the Washtenaw County prosecutor over Karen McDonald at a contentious party convention in Detroit that also reflected broader political tensions within the party.

Savit’s nomination comes at a time when Democrats in Michigan and nationally have faced criticism and accusations from some opponents and commentators over alleged tolerance of antisemitic rhetoric tied to protests and divisions over U.S. policy in the Middle East. His selection, however, also underscores the complexity of those claims, as Savit himself is Jewish and has been an active figure within Democratic legal and political circles.

The endorsement was decided at the Michigan Democratic Party convention at Huntington Place, where more than 7,200 delegates gathered to vote on candidates for statewide offices ahead of the November election.

Savit will now face Republican nominee Doug Lloyd, setting up a general election contest between two longtime prosecutors with sharply different views on the role of the attorney general’s office.

“We’re on the front line right now,” Savit told delegates following his nomination. “We’re facing challenges from Washington, D.C. We’re facing challenges from the corrupting influence of money in our politics. But what you see reflected on this stage is a hopeful vision for the future.”

Lloyd criticized Savit shortly after the nomination was announced, arguing that his policies reflect a politically driven approach to prosecution.

“Michigan deserves something different,” Lloyd said. “A legal system grounded in fairness, consistency, and respect for the rule of law.”

Savit’s supporters pointed to his record as Washtenaw County prosecutor, including his stances on criminal justice reform and environmental issues. Some delegates also emphasized his independence from corporate and utility-backed funding as a key reason for their support.

The convention itself highlighted ongoing divisions within the Democratic Party, particularly around issues related to campus protests, foreign policy, and internal messaging. Critics have used those divisions to accuse Democrats of failing to adequately address antisemitism in certain activist spaces, while party leaders and many members have rejected those claims and pointed to the diversity within their ranks.

Savit’s nomination places him at the center of that broader political debate as the campaign moves into the general election phase.

In other action, Democrats also nominated Lt. Gov. Garlin Gilchrist II as their candidate for secretary of state, as the party looks to present a unified ticket in November.

Chaos and Division Mark Michigan Democratic Convention as Key Endorsements Emerge

 

DETROIT  What was intended to showcase party unity ahead of a critical election year instead exposed deep divisions within the Michigan Democratic Party, as thousands of delegates gathered in Detroit for a chaotic and at times contentious endorsement convention.

More than 7,200 delegates packed the Huntington Place convention center Sunday, a record turnout that underscored both high engagement and rising tensions within the party. By the end of a turbulent day marked by delays, boos, and internal clashes, Lt. Gov. Garlin Gilchrist II secured the party’s nomination for secretary of state, while Washtenaw County Prosecutor Eli Savit won the endorsement for attorney general.

Both candidates are now expected to appear on the November ballot as the party’s official nominees.

Disruptions and Delays

The convention was plagued by logistical issues from the start. Credentialing errors delayed voting for hours, sparking frustration among delegates who shouted from the convention floor and demanded the process move forward.

Voting, originally scheduled for earlier in the day, did not begin until late afternoon. Some delegates were unable to cast ballots electronically, forcing long lines and further aggravating an already tense atmosphere.

Party Chair Curtis Hertel Jr. attempted to reassure attendees, promising that all properly registered delegates would be allowed to vote. Still, the delays contributed to a sense of disorganization that critics quickly seized upon.

Boos Signal Party Divisions

Tensions were not limited to logistics. Political divisions within the party surfaced repeatedly, most visibly during speeches.

U.S. Rep. Haley Stevens was met with sustained boos during her Senate campaign remarks, highlighting a growing divide between establishment Democrats and progressive activists. Stevens attempted to calm the crowd, telling delegates, “Democrats, I love you, even when we disagree,” but the reaction underscored the challenges ahead in unifying the party.

Progressive favorite Abdul El-Sayed drew strong support from activists, with chants of his name echoing through the hall. His calls for sweeping reforms, including Medicare for All and the abolition of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, reflected the energy of the party’s left flank.

High-Stakes Endorsements

Despite the turmoil, the convention produced decisive outcomes in key races.

Gilchrist, who has served alongside Gov. Gretchen Whitmer for nearly two terms, secured the secretary of state endorsement after abandoning a gubernatorial bid earlier this year. Though he lacks direct experience overseeing elections, supporters argued he would defend voting rights and modernize state systems.

Savit’s victory over Oakland County Prosecutor Karen McDonald came despite strong backing for McDonald from major labor unions. Savit, known for progressive reforms such as eliminating cash bail in certain cases, is expected to face scrutiny from conservatives in the general election.

Contentious Regent Race

One of the most divisive contests involved the University of Michigan Board of Regents. Civil rights attorney Amir Makled defeated incumbent Jordan Acker in a race shaped heavily by controversy over the university’s handling of pro-Palestinian protests.

The contest became a flashpoint for broader ideological battles within the party, with activists criticizing Acker while Makled faced scrutiny over past social media activity. The outcome reflected the growing influence of activist-driven issues in party politics.

A Party at a Crossroads

The convention also served as a platform for national figures, including Kamala Harris, Cory Booker, and Andy Beshear, all of whom addressed delegates ahead of potential future campaigns.

Whitmer, speaking to the crowd, acknowledged challenges at the national level and urged Democrats to remain focused on upcoming elections.

Still, the events of the weekend highlighted a party grappling with internal disagreements over policy, messaging, and leadership direction.

Looking Ahead

By the convention’s close, party leaders emphasized unity, with Gilchrist declaring, “Our unity is our strength.” But the visible fractures—ranging from ideological disputes to organizational missteps—suggest that achieving that unity may prove difficult.

With high-stakes races looming in November, the Michigan Democratic Party now faces the challenge of consolidating its base while navigating the divisions laid bare in Detroit.

Divisions deepen among Democrats in Michigan’s pivotal Senate race

 

 A closely watched U.S. Senate race in Michigan is exposing deep divisions within the Democratic Party as candidates debate ideology, electability and key policy issues ahead of the August primary.

Abdul El-Sayed, a progressive candidate aligned with the policies of Bernie Sanders, is pushing back against concerns from party leaders who fear his nomination could jeopardize Democrats’ chances in November. El-Sayed argues that bold positions — not moderation — win elections, pointing to the victories of Donald Trump as evidence.

The open Senate seat is considered critical to control of the chamber. Republicans are rallying behind former Rep. Mike Rogers, with outside groups planning major spending in the state.

Within the Democratic primary, El-Sayed faces Rep. Haley Stevens and state Sen. Mallory McMorrow. Stevens is viewed by party insiders as the most electable, while McMorrow is positioning herself as a bridge between moderates and progressives.

The race has highlighted sharp disagreements on policy. El-Sayed supports abolishing Immigration and Customs Enforcement and backs Medicare for All, while his opponents favor more incremental reforms. Campaign financing has also become a flashpoint, with El-Sayed rejecting AIPAC and corporate PAC money and criticizing his rivals for accepting it.

Tensions have escalated as candidates question each other’s consistency and leadership. El-Sayed has accused party leaders of lacking “courage,” while McMorrow has countered that his campaign relies more on rhetoric than practical solutions.

Foreign policy — particularly the Israel-Hamas conflict — has emerged as one of the most divisive issues. El-Sayed has been sharply critical of Israel’s actions in Gaza and U.S. support for the country. Stevens has rejected claims that Israel’s actions constitute genocide, while McMorrow has expressed concern over potential war crimes and called for a resolution to the conflict.

The candidates have also clashed over campaign tactics. Stevens and McMorrow criticized El-Sayed for appearing with political commentator Hasan Piker, citing past controversial remarks. El-Sayed defended the appearances as part of engaging with diverse viewpoints.

The primary reflects a broader debate within the Democratic Party: whether to nominate a candidate who energizes the progressive base or one seen as more competitive with swing voters in a battleground state.

Some voters remain divided. While younger and more progressive voters are drawn to El-Sayed’s platform, others worry his positions could alienate moderates in a general election.

With control of the Senate potentially at stake, the outcome in Michigan could have national implications.

Streisand Effect Reshapes Michigan Senate Primary as Abdul El-Sayed Surges

 

Detroit, MI — A new Emerson College Polling survey is shaking up Michigan’s Democratic Senate primary, showing Abdul El-Sayed surging into a statistical tie for first place — a dramatic shift in a race that had looked far more settled just months ago.

According to the April poll, El-Sayed now commands 24% support, up sharply from 16% in January, putting him neck-and-neck with Mallory McMorrow, who also sits at 24%. Meanwhile, Haley Stevens has slipped to 13%, marking a notable decline in her standing.

The “Streisand Effect” in Play

The sudden rise of El-Sayed is being linked by some analysts to the Streisand effect — the idea that attempts to suppress or attack a candidate can unintentionally boost their visibility. Increased attention, whether positive or negative, appears to have expanded El-Sayed’s reach among voters who may not have previously been engaged.

Dominating Younger Voters

One of the most striking findings in the poll is El-Sayed’s overwhelming support among younger voters. Among those under 40, he leads by a wide margin:

• El-Sayed: 35%

• Nearest competitor: 18%

This 17-point advantage suggests a strong generational divide in the race, with younger voters gravitating toward his message and campaign style.

A Wide-Open Race

Despite the movement at the top, the race remains far from decided. A significant 36% of voters are still undecided, leaving ample room for shifts in momentum as the campaign progresses.

That large undecided bloc could ultimately determine whether El-Sayed’s surge is a temporary spike or the beginning of a sustained lead.

What It Means Going Forward

The numbers point to a Democratic primary that is increasingly fluid:

• El-Sayed is gaining traction and visibility

• McMorrow remains firmly competitive at the top

• Stevens faces pressure to regain lost ground

• A large share of voters are still up for grabs

With months to go, the Michigan Senate race is shaping up to be one of the most unpredictable and closely watched primaries in the country.

Rising Waters Put Cheboygan on Edge as Dam Reaches ‘Ready’ Evacuation Phase

 

CHEBOYGAN, Mich. — A growing flood threat in Northern Michigan has pushed the Cheboygan Dam into the “Ready” phase of its emergency evacuation protocol, signaling heightened concern for residents as water levels continue to rise at a dangerous pace.

Officials confirmed early Monday morning that water behind the dam has climbed to within 12 inches of the top — a critical threshold that triggers the first stage of the region’s “Ready, Set, Go” evacuation framework. At this stage, residents living between the dam and Lake Huron are being urged to prepare for a possible evacuation.

A Situation Intensified by Weather

The surge in water levels is being driven by a combination of heavy spring rainfall and rapid snowmelt following a record-setting March snowfall. Additional rain in the forecast threatens to worsen conditions in the coming days, increasing the likelihood that the situation could escalate quickly.

Governor Gretchen Whitmer has already declared a state of emergency for the area, activating Michigan’s State Emergency Operations Center to coordinate response efforts and allocate resources where needed.

What “Ready” Means for Residents

Under the current “Ready” phase, authorities are not yet ordering evacuations — but they are making it clear that residents should be prepared to move at a moment’s notice. Emergency officials are advising people to:

• Pack essential items, including medications and important documents

• Secure outdoor belongings and move valuables to higher ground

• Avoid riverbanks and flood-prone areas

• Monitor official updates and alerts closely

If conditions worsen, the situation will move into the “Set” phase — when evacuation becomes more imminent — followed by the “Go” phase, which would trigger mandatory evacuations and possible road closures.

Emergency Measures Already Underway

Crews have been working around the clock to mitigate the risk. Thousands of sandbags have been deployed to control water flow, while large pumps are actively diverting water around the dam. Additionally, a timber debris screen has been removed from one of the dam’s gates to increase water capacity and relieve pressure on the structure.

As a precaution, the U.S. 23 bascule bridge in the area has been closed due to safety concerns tied to the rising water levels.

Officials Urge Calm — and Accuracy

Cheboygan County Sheriff Todd Ross has emphasized the importance of relying on verified information, warning residents not to spread rumors or misinformation about the situation. While current projections suggest limited residential impact even if water overtops the dam, officials acknowledge that certain areas — particularly parts of the west side near the river — could see localized flooding affecting businesses and nearby streets.

A Community on Alert

For now, Cheboygan remains in a tense holding pattern — not yet evacuating, but no longer in the clear. The coming days will be critical as weather conditions and water levels determine whether the situation stabilizes or escalates into a full-scale emergency.

Residents are being told to stay vigilant, stay informed, and most importantly — be ready.

Oakland County Approves Controversial Police Drone Program Amid Civil Liberties Concerns

 

OAKLAND COUNTY, Mich. — In a move that has ignited fierce debate across Southeast Michigan, the Oakland County Board of Commissioners voted last week to approve a controversial new drone pilot program for law enforcement—prompting immediate backlash from residents who warn of expanding government surveillance and erosion of civil liberties.

The measure passed by a 13–4 vote, clearing the way for a 9-month pilot program that will deploy drones in coordination with police and emergency response units.

A Divided Vote

Four commissioners broke ranks and voted against the program:

• Charlie Cavell

• Ann Erickson Gault

• Kristen Nelson

• Yolanda Smith Charles

They were the only members of the board to oppose the measure, signaling a clear minority stance in what has become one of the county’s most contentious public safety decisions in recent years.

“We Don’t Want to Be Watched”

Public reaction at the meeting—and in the days since—has been intense.

Residents voiced strong objections during public comment, warning that the program represents the beginning of what some described as a “mass surveillance infrastructure.”

“We don't want to be watched — the infrastructure of mass surveillance. The very idea is an appalling invasion of our privacy and our civil liberties, and it is the exact opposite of public safety,” one resident said during the hearing.

Critics argue that once such systems are in place, their use often expands beyond original intent—raising concerns about mission creep, data collection, and long-term monitoring of law-abiding citizens.

What the Program Does

County officials have framed the initiative as a limited pilot program, designed to test how drones can assist in:

• Emergency response to 911 calls

• Search and rescue operations

• Crime scene assessment

• Officer safety in high-risk situations

Supporters say the technology could reduce response times and provide real-time situational awareness without putting officers directly in harm’s way.

The Bigger Debate: Safety vs. Surveillance

The approval places Oakland County at the center of a growing national debate: where to draw the line between public safety innovation and personal privacy.

Opponents argue that aerial surveillance—especially when paired with high-resolution cameras, thermal imaging, or potential facial recognition—poses serious constitutional questions, particularly under the Fourth Amendment.

Supporters counter that drones are simply another tool, no different than helicopters or body cameras, and that proper policies and oversight can prevent abuse.

What Comes Next

The drone program will now move into its pilot phase, where its use, policies, and public impact will be closely watched. Officials say the program will be evaluated before any permanent expansion is considered.

But for many residents, the vote itself is already a turning point.

The question now facing Oakland County—and potentially the rest of Michigan—is not just how drones will be used, but how much surveillance the public is willing to accept in the name of safety.

AWOL on the Campaign Trail: John James Skips Debates as Questions Mount Over Where He Really Is

 

A growing controversy is surrounding Michigan gubernatorial candidate John James after he declined to participate in multiple scheduled debates—including a high-profile forum hosted by the Oakland County Republican Party set for April 30 that is expected to be televised and broadcast across more than 30 radio stations statewide.

The absence has drawn sharp criticism from party leadership and raised broader questions about transparency, accountability, and the candidate’s campaign strategy.

Debate No-Show Draws Party Rebuke

In a public statement, Oakland County Republican Party Chair Vance Patrick expressed frustration over James’ refusal to attend the debate, noting that the event had been scheduled to meet conditions previously set by the campaign.

“It’s unfortunate that John James won’t agree to participate in our gubernatorial debate later this month,” Patrick said. “As the largest county party in the state… we were offering significant statewide exposure so Republican voters can make informed decisions this August.”

Patrick added that volunteers who had previously supported James’ campaigns were “very disappointed” by what he described as a dismissal of their efforts.

Questions Over Candidate’s Whereabouts

The controversy has intensified following claims reported by TMZ that James has been vacationing in Turks and Caicos during a period of government disruption—an allegation that, if true, could further complicate his public image as an active and engaged candidate.

James has denied the claim. However, critics argue that his response has only fueled further skepticism.

Among the concerns raised:

• A social media post showing James at the Detroit Tigers’ Opening Day game appeared to reuse an image previously posted in 2025.

• Another post depicting him at a Michigan hunting range has been questioned due to seasonal inconsistencies—specifically, visible green foliage that does not align with typical early-April conditions in the state.

Strategic Silence or Political Risk?

James’ absence from debates—and the lack of direct engagement with critics—has left a vacuum that opponents and even members of his own party are beginning to fill.

Debates are traditionally seen as a critical test of a candidate’s readiness for executive office, offering voters a chance to evaluate policy positions, temperament, and command of key

issues. Skipping such forums, particularly one with significant statewide reach, carries political risk.

At the same time, some campaigns have historically avoided debates when holding strong polling positions or seeking to limit exposure to unscripted moments.

Whether that calculation applies here remains unclear.

A Campaign Under Pressure

As the August primary approaches, the stakes are rising for all candidates in the Michigan gubernatorial race. For James, the current controversy presents a dual challenge: addressing questions about his absence while reassuring voters and party leaders of his commitment to the campaign.

For now, the central question being asked by critics—and increasingly echoed within Republican circles—is a simple one:

Why isn’t he showing up?

Until that question is answered directly, the narrative surrounding his campaign may continue to be shaped less by policy—and more by perception.

Detroit TV Shakeup: Taryn Asher Fired from Fox 2, Raising Questions About Industry Turbulence — and a Rare Husband-Wife Exit

 

The sudden firing of longtime Fox 2 Detroit anchor Taryn Asher is sending shockwaves through the local media landscape, raising broader questions about newsroom culture, management decisions, and an unusual personal twist involving her former spouse, Jason Carr.

According to her attorney, Asher was quietly terminated in November after more than a decade with Fox 2 Detroit. For months, her absence from the anchor desk went unexplained publicly, fueling speculation among viewers. Now, that silence has been broken — and it points toward a potentially contentious legal battle.

Attorney Matthew Turner said efforts to reverse the decision failed, despite months of negotiations. The situation escalated to the point where Asher’s workspace was recently cleared out, signaling a definitive end to her tenure. Legal action is now expected.

At the center of the dispute are allegations of unequal treatment. Turner claims Asher began noticing changes in assignments, scheduling, and overall treatment compared to her male counterpart following a shift in management. When those concerns were raised internally, the response, according to her legal team, was not corrective — but punitive.

Asher herself had previously acknowledged an “unexpected work-related matter” in a February social media post, thanking supporters while remaining largely silent on specifics at the time.

A Michigan State University graduate, Asher had become a familiar and trusted presence in Detroit television since joining the station in 2007. She rose through the ranks to become co-anchor in 2022, helping lead a new era following the retirement of veteran anchors Huel Perkins and Monica Gayle.

But what makes this story even more unusual is the broader personal context.

Asher’s ex-husband, Jason Carr, was also previously fired from Detroit television — a rare and notable circumstance in a tightly connected local media market. Carr, a well-known on-air personality in his own right, had his own high-profile departure, meaning both former spouses have now faced abrupt exits from prominent TV roles.

That raises an eyebrow-raising question: How often does a former husband-and-wife duo both end up fired from major local television positions?

Taryn Asher and ex-husband Jason Carr

In an industry where visibility, reputation, and continuity are everything, such dual departures are highly uncommon — and underscore just how volatile the television news business has become in recent years.

Meanwhile, Fox 2 management has remained largely silent. News Director Brooks Blanton has not publicly addressed the situation, and Asher’s profile reportedly remained on the station’s website even after her termination — adding to the confusion surrounding her status.

Now, the matter appears headed toward litigation, where more details could emerge about what exactly led to the breakdown between a longtime anchor and one of Detroit’s most prominent news stations.

For viewers, the story is more than just a personnel change. It’s a glimpse behind the scenes of an industry often perceived as polished and stable — but one that, increasingly, is anything but.

And in this case, it’s not just one career disrupted — it’s two, tied together by a shared past and an unusually parallel professional outcome.

Detroit Man Charged in Alleged Threat Against Dearborn Mayor Abdullah Hammoud

 

A Detroit man is facing criminal charges after authorities say he made threats to assassinate Abdullah Hammoud, the mayor of Dearborn.

According to officials, Joseph Lipani was arrested and charged with one misdemeanor count of malicious use of a telecommunications service. The charge stems from alleged threatening communications directed at Hammoud. Following his arrest, Lipani was released on a personal bond and placed under GPS monitoring as the case proceeds through the court system.

The incident has drawn renewed attention to the growing concerns over threats against public officials, particularly at the local level, where leaders are often more directly accessible to the public.

Mayor Hammoud, who made history as Dearborn’s first Arab American and Muslim mayor, addressed the situation by emphasizing resilience in the face of intimidation. He stated that this is not the first time he has received death threats during his time in public service. Despite that, Hammoud made clear he does not intend to be deterred.

“I will not back down in fear,” Hammoud said, reaffirming his commitment to continue serving the residents of Dearborn.

The case underscores a broader national pattern in which elected officials—regardless of party or position—are increasingly facing harassment and threats, often delivered through digital or telecommunications channels. Law enforcement agencies have responded by taking such threats more seriously, even when they result in misdemeanor-level charges, citing the potential for escalation.

Legal proceedings against Lipani are ongoing. If convicted, he could face penalties associated with the misuse of communication systems to issue threats.

As the situation develops, city officials and law enforcement continue to monitor for any additional risks, while Hammoud maintains his focus on governing and community leadership.

WHERE IS JOHN JAMES — AND WHY ARE REPUBLICANS LOOKING ELSEWHERE?

 

There’s a growing frustration inside Michigan’s Republican base, and it’s becoming harder to ignore: where exactly is John James — and does he actually want this job?

For months, James has run a campaign built on distance. No real debates. Limited exposure. Carefully controlled appearances. Minimal willingness to step into unscripted environments where voters — not handlers — set the tone. That might work if you’re protecting a lead. It doesn’t work when voters are still deciding whether you’ve earned their trust.

And now, that strategy is starting to backfire publicly.

At the recent Michigan Republican endorsement convention in Novi, James didn’t just receive a lukewarm reception — he was booed. Not by Democrats. Not by political opponents. By Republicans. By the very base he needs to win.

That moment cut through the polished messaging and exposed something deeper: a growing disconnect between James and the grassroots.

It gets worse.

James reportedly leads Michigan’s congressional delegation in missed House votes this session — a statistic that reinforces the perception of disengagement. Whether there are explanations or not, voters aren’t reading footnotes. They’re seeing a pattern: absence, avoidance, and a campaign that feels more managed than motivated.

Then came the optics disaster — a widely circulated image of James at a luxury beachfront resort during a congressional recess. On its own, that’s not disqualifying. But in the middle of economic uncertainty and federal instability, it feeds directly into the narrative that he’s out of touch and not fully locked in.

And politics is about narratives. Right now, his isn’t good.

While James has been playing defense, Perry Johnson has been doing the opposite — flooding the state with ads, dominating airwaves, and aggressively introducing himself to voters. Love him or hate him, Johnson is visible, active, and undeniably present.

That matters.

Republican voters aren’t just looking for a name they recognize. They’re looking for energy. Engagement. Fight. Someone who shows up — everywhere — and makes the case directly.

Johnson is doing that.

James, by contrast, is running a campaign that increasingly looks like it was designed to avoid risk rather than win a race. And in a crowded primary where momentum can shift quickly, that’s a dangerous gamble.

Because here’s the reality: voters don’t reward candidates who seem hesitant to face them. They don’t rally behind someone who appears distant, insulated, or overly managed. And they certainly don’t ignore it when that candidate gets booed in his own party’s backyard.

If John James wants to turn this around, it won’t come from another controlled event or carefully crafted message. It will require something he has so far avoided — direct, consistent, unfiltered engagement with the people he’s asking to lead.

Until then, the vacuum he’s created is being filled.

And right now, Perry Johnson is the one stepping into it.

Michigan Republicans Rally Behind Statewide Slate at Novi Convention

NOVI, Mich. — Michigan Republicans moved with unusual discipline Saturday, endorsing a full slate of candidates for key statewide offices during a convention that party leaders described as notably smoother than past gatherings.

Roughly 2,100 delegates convened at the Vibe Credit Union Showplace, where party leadership emphasized preparation and unity as the driving forces behind a convention largely free of the internal disputes that have, in prior years, defined similar events.

Jim Runestad, chair of the Michigan Republican Party, credited behind-the-scenes coordination for the lack of procedural clashes.

“This is what happens when you do the advance work,” Runestad said, pointing to a deliberate effort to resolve disagreements before delegates took the floor.

Key Races: Attorney General and Secretary of State

The convention’s most closely watched contests came in two high-profile races.

Delegates selected Eaton County Prosecutor Doug Lloyd as the Republican nominee for attorney general, defeating Birmingham attorney Kevin Kijewski.

For secretary of state, Macomb County Clerk Anthony Forlini secured the endorsement over Oakland County businesswoman and activist Monica Yatooma and Clarkston school board member Amanda Love.

Both positions are currently held by Democrats, setting up competitive general election battles in November.

Supreme Court and Education Boards

Delegates also endorsed candidates for two seats on the Michigan Supreme Court, backing Oakland County Judge Michael Warren and Oscoda County Judge Casandra Morse-Bills. They are expected to challenge incumbents Megan Cavanagh and Noah Hood, as Republicans aim to chip away at the court’s current Democratic majority.

For the Michigan State Board of Education, delegates endorsed Mount Pleasant small business owner Bree Moeggenberg and financial analyst Terence Collins.

University Boards See GOP Picks

Republicans also filled out their slate for influential university governing boards:

• For the Michigan State University Board of Trustees: State Sen. Roger Victory and former Novi City Council member Julie Maday

• For the University of Michigan Board of Regents: business executive Lena Epstein and Bloomfield Township trustee Michael Schostak

• For the Wayne State University Board of Governors: educator Andy Anuzis and Troy-based financial professional Christa Murphy

A Shift in Tone — and Strategy

Unlike previous conventions marked by procedural disputes and factional clashes, Saturday’s event reflected a more unified party apparatus. Only two races were contested, and both concluded without extended conflict on the convention floor.

The streamlined process suggests a strategic pivot by Michigan Republicans as they prepare for a competitive general election cycle, where control of key statewide offices — including attorney general and secretary of state — could shape election administration, legal battles, and policy direction.

Democrats are expected to finalize their own slate at a convention scheduled for April 19, setting the stage for a high-stakes statewide contest heading into November.

What Comes Next

With endorsements secured, Republican candidates now transition into general election mode, where fundraising, messaging, and turnout operations will determine whether the party can reclaim ground in statewide offices currently held by Democrats.

Saturday’s convention offered a preview of that strategy: less infighting, more coordination — and a clear signal that Michigan Republicans intend to present a unified front in 2026.

Election Eve Smear Campaign: How Monica Yatooma Became the Target of Last-Minute Political Sabotage

 

Monica Yatooma 

As Michigan Republicans head into a critical Secretary of State endorsement convention, a familiar and troubling pattern has re-emerged: last-minute attacks, anonymous amplification, and strategically timed misinformation aimed at derailing a leading candidate.

This time, the target is Monica Yatooma.

And the playbook is unmistakable.

---

A Coordinated Strike—Right on Cue

Within days of the convention, a blog post authored by political operative Brandon Hall suddenly surfaced, raising so-called “serious questions” about Yatooma. The piece relied heavily on insinuation, selective photos, and guilt-by-association tactics—offering no concrete evidence of wrongdoing and in this case being friends with a potentially connected democrat voter and casting a cloud of suspicion at the most politically consequential moment possible.

This is not coincidence. It is timing by design.

Hall’s emergence in the closing stretch of a race is not new. His pattern is well established: appear late, inject controversy, and shape narratives favorable to certain candidates while attacking others. The result is not journalism—it is influence.

---

The Substance: Thin Allegations, Heavy Implications

At the core of the attack is an attempt to tie Yatooma to another individual labeled as a “radical activist.” The evidence? Photographs of one of Yatooma's friends taken at public events and an unsubstantiated claim of campaign involvement.

No policy alignment. No financial connection. No official role.

Just implication.

Yatooma has directly and unequivocally refuted these claims. She stated clearly that the individual in question did not run her campaign operations, was not part of her team, and would have no role in any future administration.

---

The Echo Chamber Effect

Once the initial article dropped, anonymous commentary quickly escalated the rhetoric—transforming vague “questions” into outright accusations. Claims grew more extreme, more personal, and more detached from verifiable fact.

This is how modern political mudslinging works.
Plant the narrative. Let anonymous voices amplify it. Then point to the noise as if it validates the claim.

Meanwhile, separate political commentary pieces pushing competing candidates reinforced the broader effort to discredit Yatooma’s candidacy altogether .

This is not independent analysis. It is narrative alignment.

---

The Motive: Stop a Rising Candidate

Yatooma’s own statement cuts through the fog. She called the attacks “vile,” “desperate,” and devoid of evidence. She challenged her critics to produce proof—none has been presented.

She also made something else clear: she is not behind any anonymous attacks against other candidates, and any suggestion otherwise is false.

So why the escalation?

Because momentum matters. And when a candidate begins to solidify support, opponents who cannot win on substance often turn to strategy—disrupt, distract, and damage.

---

Dirty Politics, Plain and Simple

This is not about vetting a candidate. It is about weaponizing timing and perception.

A photograph becomes a “relationship.”
An acquaintance becomes “influence.”
A question becomes an accusation.

And all of it is deployed just days before delegates must decide.

This is the politics of desperation.

---

A Message to Delegates: Facts Over Feelings

As this race reaches its final decision point, the responsibility now shifts to the delegates.

They must do what political operatives hope they won’t—slow down, research every candidate, and separate fact from fiction.

This moment demands discipline.

Delegates should examine records, verify claims, and ask a simple but critical question: who is the most experienced and most electable candidate capable of winning in November?

Not who is the loudest.
Not who is the most familiar.
Not who is a friend.

Because elections are not won on friendships—they are won on credibility, strength, and the ability to carry the state.

Feelings must be put aside for the betterment of Michigan.

---

The Bottom Line

Monica Yatooma is not facing a fact-based challenge. She is facing a last-minute smear campaign built on inference, amplified by anonymous voices, and strategically timed to inflict maximum damage.

The real issue is not the allegations themselves—but the method.

Because when political actors wait until the final hour to release unproven claims, rely on guilt by association, and coordinate narratives through friendly channels, it is not accountability.

It is a hit job.

And in this case, the evidence points to a candidate not exposed—but targeted—at the exact moment delegates  were supposed to decide.

Campaign Donations from ICE-Linked Sources Draw Scrutiny in Michigan Senate Race

A recent report has brought renewed attention to campaign finance in Michigan’s closely watched U.S. Senate race, particularly regarding donations connected to companies and individuals tied to Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).

The race features four major candidates: Democrats Haley Stevens, Abdul El-Sayed, and Mallory McMorrow, and Republican Mike Rogers. While all are competing for the same seat, their decisions on accepting money connected to ICE-related contractors reveal meaningful differences in judgment and priorities.

    ROGERS          STEVENS       MCMORROW    EL-SAYED

Haley Stevens: Reform Message Meets Funding Questions

U.S. Rep. Haley Stevens has been outspoken in criticizing ICE practices and calling for reform and accountability.

However, her campaign has accepted donations from individuals and organizations connected to companies that provide equipment and services used in immigration enforcement. While her campaign defends these contributions by pointing to her legislative record, the contrast is difficult to ignore.

For some voters, this creates a tension between message and money—raising reasonable questions about consistency and whether financial support from these sources undermines calls for reform.

Abdul El-Sayed: A Clear Break from ICE-Linked Funding

Abdul El-Sayed has taken a firm and unambiguous position.

He has refused donations from ICE contractors altogether, making that decision part of his broader campaign identity. His approach avoids the conflicts seen elsewhere in the race and offers voters a clear standard on the issue.

In a field where others have accepted or returned such donations, his stance stands out as the most consistent.

Mallory McMorrow: Course Correction After the Fact

State Sen. Mallory McMorrow initially accepted donations tied to ICE-connected sources but later returned them following increased scrutiny.

While returning the money demonstrates responsiveness, it also highlights that the issue was not addressed until it became public. For some voters, that raises a fair question: should those lines have been drawn from the beginning?

Her response places her between candidates who accepted the funding outright and those who rejected it entirely.

Mike Rogers: Fully Aligned with Enforcement—and Its Backers

Republican candidate Mike Rogers has taken the most direct approach.

He supports strong immigration enforcement policies and has accepted significant donations from individuals and companies connected to ICE operations, including private detention and security contractors.

Unlike some of his opponents, there is no contradiction between his policy positions and his funding sources. However, his campaign’s financial ties to industries that profit from detention and enforcement may still raise broader concerns for voters about the influence of those interests.

A Broader Issue of Trust and Transparency

The differences among these candidates reflect a larger question in modern politics: not just what candidates say, but who helps fund their campaigns.

Many of the companies connected to these donations have long-standing government contracts, and their involvement in political fundraising is not unusual. Still, when those connections intersect with one of the most controversial issues in the country, they take on greater significance.

For voters, the issue is less about the legality of the donations and more about trust, judgment, and alignment between words and actions.

Conclusion

Michigan’s Senate race offers voters a clear contrast in how candidates handle politically sensitive funding.

• Some accepted ICE-linked donations and stood by them

• One accepted and later returned the money

• One rejected it outright

These choices are not just technical campaign decisions—they reflect broader approaches to leadership, accountability, and consistency.

Ultimately, voters will decide which approach they believe best represents their values.

Dangerous Delegate?: Viral Rage to Courtroom Reality: The Jayden Scott Saga Exposes a Pattern of Recklessness and Jail Time

In a matter of days, Jayden D. Scott transformed himself from a fringe agitator into a cautionary example of what happens when incendiary rhetoric collides with real-world consequences.

At a volatile protest in Minneapolis following the death of Renee Nicole Good, Scott didn’t just show up—he escalated. Standing before a charged crowd, he shouted a line that would ignite national backlash: “We executed one of you yesterday.” (WDIV)

That statement was not political discourse. It was not protest. It was a declaration steeped in menace, delivered in a moment of national grief and tension. And it immediately raised serious questions about judgment, intent, and fitness for any leadership role.

A Pattern of Deception

As scrutiny intensified, Scott attempted to present himself as a corporate leader stepping down in the wake of controversy. But that narrative quickly unraveled.

Reports revealed he falsely claimed to be the CEO of a Michigan-based healthcare investment firm—an assertion flatly denied by the actual leadership. (FOX 2 Detroit)

This wasn’t a misunderstanding. It was, according to those directly involved, a fabrication—complete with alleged efforts to create the illusion of authority and credibility. In a crisis of his own making, Scott didn’t just inflame tensions; he misled the public about who he was.

The story involving a Michigan company's CEO resigning after being caught on camera lashing out at anti-ICE protesters in Minneapolis has a new twist: The individual in the viral video is not who he says he is.

But that didn't stop media reports citing him as the latest piece of evolving news around protests directed toward the federal government.

The backstory:

A video from Minneapolis shows a man holding a megaphone yelling expletives at protesters while he stands in front of dozens of armed military members.

The man, Jayden Scott, says "And all you liberal commie ******* keep your hands to yourself or you are going to get hurt today alright."

"We executed one of you yesterday," he said, referring to 37-year-old Renee Good, who was killed by an ICE agent after a confrontation in Minneapolis last week.

Scott, a resident of Bay City, would later announce on LinkedIn that he would be stepping down as CEO of Harmony Investment Group, a private health care company based in Troy.

Except Scott is not in charge of Harmony Investment Group. 

Big picture view:

Scott's announcement went viral, and was part of several stories posted online in the wake of his declaration he would be stepping down.

The current CEO is Zain Sikander, who told FOX 2 and others that he runs the company and was blindsided by the news perpetuated by Scott.

He says Scott is an imposer who created a fake website for the company that included details about him working at the firm. Speaking to FOX 2 by phone, Zain said he has known Scott for a long time because both lived in the Saginaw-Bay City area. 

According to Zain, for some reason, Scott had claimed he had an affiliation with his companies before.

Bizarre situation spurs legal questions 

What can a company do if someone claims to be associated with it and brings about concerning coverage that may hurt its business?

According to attorney Jon Marko, a business that finds itself in this position has multiple options.

"If this is true, the company would have legal recourse against the individual for making these false and defamatory statements," he said. "There would be defamation claims. There could potentially be claims about tortious interference with a business."

Dig deeper:

There is also a crisis communication element to the situation as well.

Matt Friedman who works in public relations said the first thing a company can do is make sure current customers know the facts about what is happening.

"First things first from a communication’s standpoint is to make sure that current customers know the facts and get that reassurance that everything is ok," he said. "That the company is a victim here. And that is the most important message most immediately, is to current customers."

From there, the follow-up is to communicate to the outside world and set the record straight.

"The most important thing there is to get it right online because this story will live for a long time online, whether the company deserves it or not," he said.

 And then you sort of work outside from there." 

Recklessness Meets Reality

Then came the courtroom.

Already facing a seven-day jail sentence in Bay County, Scott was expected to report and serve his time. Instead, he appeared via Zoom, delaying the inevitable and prompting a judge to consider issuing a warrant.

That moment crystallizes the broader issue: a man willing to project strength and dominance in public, yet hesitant to face the basic obligations of the legal system.

The contrast is stark. On one hand, a megaphone and threats. On the other, avoidance and delay when accountability comes due.

The Bigger Picture

Scott’s actions didn’t occur in a vacuum. They came at a time of heightened national tension surrounding immigration enforcement, protests, and political polarization.

But even in that environment, there are lines—and Scott crossed them.

• He amplified division with violent rhetoric.

• He misrepresented his professional standing.

• He attempted to sidestep legal accountability.

And in doing so, he didn’t just damage his own credibility—he injected more instability into an already volatile moment.

This is not a story about free speech. It’s about responsibility.

When someone chooses to inflame a crowd with language of execution, falsely claims authority, and then dodges consequences, the issue is no longer political—it’s personal conduct.

The legal system has now stepped in, as it should. And the message is simple:

You can shout into a megaphone.
You can go viral.
But eventually, you still have to answer to a judge.

Jayden D. Scott’s 7-day jail sentence was not related to the viral rally incident—that part often gets confused.

The actual reason:

He was ordered to serve 7 days in the Bay County Circuit Court jail for a probation violation tied to an earlier, unrelated case.

What that means:

• Scott had previously been convicted of a separate offense (not the rally).

• Instead of full jail time, he was likely placed on probation with conditions.

• He violated those conditions 

• As a result, the judge imposed a short jail sentence—7 days—as a penalty.

Why the confusion happened:

The timeline overlapped:

• He made the controversial “we executed one of you” statement at a Minnesota rally.

• Days later, he was supposed to report to jail.

• He failed to appear in person and tried to handle it via Zoom, prompting the judge to threaten a warrant.

That sequence made it look like the jail sentence was tied to the rally—but legally, it was not.

The 7-day sentence = consequence of a prior probation violation, not punishment for his speech or the rally appearance.

The Bay County matter appears to be a domestic relations / family court case, not a standard criminal case. An appellate filing identifies the underlying Bay Circuit Court case as “Victoria Rose Sweet v. Jayden Daniel Scott,” LC No. 22-007095-DS. In Michigan, the “DS” suffix is used for domestic relations support matters.

Michigan Senator’s Wife Charged in Embezzlement Case Tied to Local Chamber of Commerce

 

A criminal case unfolding in Michigan has drawn attention after Kellie Lauwers

, the wife of state Sen. Dan Lauwers, was charged with multiple felonies related to alleged financial misconduct involving a small local business organization.

According to court records filed in 72nd District Court in Port Huron, Kellie Lauwers faces two felony charges: one count of embezzlement and one count of using a computer to commit a crime. Each charge carries a maximum penalty of up to 10 years in prison if she is convicted.

Investigation Into Missing Chamber Funds

The case stems from allegations involving the Yale Area Chamber of Commerce, a small organization in the rural farming community of Yale in St. Clair County.

Investigators say Lauwers served as the chamber’s treasurer from 2019 until February 2025, a position that gave her direct access to the organization’s financial accounts.

According to investigators with the Michigan State Police, an audit requested during the investigation identified approximately $35,200 in losses from the chamber’s funds.

The audit reportedly uncovered 11 suspicious financial transactions between December 2022 and July 2024, including:

• Unauthorized cash withdrawals from the chamber’s bank account

• Checks allegedly written to Lauwers and deposited into her personal accounts

• A $4,000 transaction dated March 28, 2024, which investigators say was mobile-deposited and endorsed by Lauwers

Authorities also obtained a search warrant for Lauwers’ bank records, which investigators say helped identify the transactions in question.

Alleged Admission During Internal Meeting

The investigation report states that the chamber’s leadership confronted Lauwers about financial discrepancies during a meeting on Nov. 25, 2024.

According to the report, chamber officials told investigators that Lauwers acknowledged taking funds from the organization over several years during that meeting.

After the confrontation, investigators say Lauwers declined to provide any statement to law enforcement.

Civil Lawsuit Allegations

Separate from the criminal case, the Yale Area Chamber of Commerce previously filed a lawsuit accusing Lauwers of writing checks to herself from chamber accounts.

The suit also alleges she forged signatures to bypass the organization’s requirement that expenditures be approved by two authorized signatures.

Additionally, the complaint claims the chamber’s debit card was used for personal purchases, including transactions at retail stores such as Dollar General.

Attorney Response

Attorneys representing Lauwers say the public should not rush to judgment.

A statement issued by the law firm Manley & Manley, which represents her, said public perceptions of the charges could change “once the facts are presented.”

Attorney General’s Office

The case is being prosecuted by the office of Dana Nessel.

In a statement, Nessel emphasized the importance of financial integrity within organizations that support local businesses.

“Chambers of commerce play an important role in supporting small businesses and strengthening local economies,” Nessel said. “Individuals trusted with managing their finances are expected to do so with integrity.”

As of now, an arraignment date has not yet been scheduled.

Political Context

Sen. Dan Lauwers, a Republican representing Brockway Township, has served in the Michigan Legislature for more than a decade and currently holds the role of minority floor leader in the Michigan Senate.

He declined to comment publicly on the charges involving his wife.

Small Community Impact

The alleged financial misconduct has had a significant impact on the Yale Area Chamber of Commerce, which operates on a relatively small budget of about $80,000 annually.

The organization is best known locally for hosting the Yale Bologna Festival, a community event that helps support small businesses and tourism in the region.

For a town of roughly 2,000 residents, the case has placed a spotlight on the importance of financial transparency within community organizations that rely heavily on trust and volunteer leadership.

If convicted on both charges, Kellie Lauwers could face substantial prison time, though the legal process is only beginning and the allegations have yet to be tested in court.